Indiana University's temperate response to the affirmative-action bake
sale held here contrast well with the response of university administrations everywhere
else, apparently. I don't think it's that we're a less liberal campus, but I wouldn't
be surprised if our liberals were more pleasant people, by and large, than those
elsewhere. Or maybe more of them are the old-fashioned type that believe in free
speech and the marketplace of ideas. At any rate,
FIRE's press
release and
Professor O'Connor's
weblog single Indiana out for praise:
This fall alone, administrators at SMU, William & Mary, the
University of Washington, UC Irvine, and Northwestern have shut down
anti-affirmative action bake sales on their campuses, ignoring the
groups' right to free speech and expressive protest while indulging the
angry reactions of those who would rather condone censorship than
encounter a viewpoint that offends them. While admins at some schools
have (presumably grudgingly) allowed the bake sales to proceed
unmolested, only administrators at
Indiana have stood up in defense of the expressive rights of all
students at the university: "It is a freedom-of-speech issue. I know
some schools have approached these events differently, but prior
restraint is not something we would normally engage in," Damon Sims,
associate dean of students, told the Indianapolis Star. "This is
one of the more significant social and political issues of our time. . .
. It is exactly the kind of dialogue that should be encouraged on
college campuses."
That's just what a university administrator ought to be saying. It seems bland and
obvious, but nowadays saying what was commonplace thirty years ago is a sign of
distinction. It's a bit like staying married to your wife, or avoiding criminal
convictions.
[ permalink, http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/03.12.16fd.htm ]
To return to Eric Rasmusen's weblog, click http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/0.rasmusen.htm.