March 7, 2001 Published in: ''More Dropouts, Higher Standards,'' letter to the editor, Academic Questions, 12:5 ( Fall 1999) June 3, 1999 Editor@aq.nas.org Dear Academic Questions, Lenore Ostrowsky's Spring 1999 article, "College Dropouts and Standardized Tests," begins with a discussion of dropout rates and the strong implicit assumption that a high dropout rate is a bad thing. Many people assume this, but why? There are two reasons why high dropout rates are a sign of health, not mistakes. First, high dropout rates show high standards. As Ostrowsky points out, Cal Tech has a high dropout rate. This is not special; when I last looked, the University of Illinois had higher dropout rates than lesser colleges in that state, and this is common for good colleges. For that matter, Harvard University has high rates of faculty dropout, if you consider denial of tenure to be a form of dropout. In each case, the existence of dropouts is a sign of high standards. Second, retaining poor students has what we economists call an "opportunity cost". Suppose the University of X can admit 1000 students per class. This year, the 1000th-highest test score is Smith, and the 1001st is Jones, so we admit Smith. Smith, however, is lazy, and his grades are marginal. One choice is to work hard with tutors and counselling to retain Smith. That choice has an opportunity cost, though, as well as a resource cost: Smith is filling up one of our 1000 slots. A second choice is to flunk out Smith and admit Jones as a transfer student for sophomore year. Since Jones is almost as good as Smith in his observable characteristics, and Smith is clearly below average in what is hard to observe, how can one say that the right thing is to keep Smith? I suspect college administrators are usually unaware of this argument, and that college dropout rates are not too high, but too low. That said, nothing in this reasoning says that test scores should not be used. Rather, all available indicators should be used to decide who gets a degree from the University of X, including test score, but freshman year performance is an excellent indicator too. Eric Rasmusen Indiana University Erasmuse@indiana.edu