<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Government_Failure</id>
	<title>Government Failure - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Government_Failure"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?title=Government_Failure&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-13T16:54:35Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.32.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?title=Government_Failure&amp;diff=2968&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Rasmusen p1vaim: Created page with &quot;*[https://epic-uchicago-edu.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Publication-1.pdf &quot;Fowlie, Meredith, Michael Greenstone, Catherine Wolfram (2018). Do Energy Effici...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?title=Government_Failure&amp;diff=2968&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2021-05-11T22:58:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;*[https://epic-uchicago-edu.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Publication-1.pdf &amp;quot;Fowlie, Meredith, Michael Greenstone, Catherine Wolfram (2018). Do Energy Effici...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;*[https://epic-uchicago-edu.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Publication-1.pdf &amp;quot;Fowlie, Meredith, Michael Greenstone, Catherine Wolfram (2018). Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program.] ''Quarterly Journal of Economics,'' 133(3): 1597–1644. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A growing number of policies and programs aim to increase investment in&lt;br /&gt;
energy efficiency, because conventional wisdom suggests that people fail to take&lt;br /&gt;
up these investments even though they have positive private returns and generate environmental benefits. Many explanations for this energy efficiency gap have&lt;br /&gt;
been put forward, but there has been surprisingly little field testing of whether&lt;br /&gt;
the conventional wisdom is correct. This article reports on the results of an experimental evaluation of the nation’s largest residential energy efficiency program—&lt;br /&gt;
the Weatherization Assistance Program—conducted on a sample of approximately&lt;br /&gt;
30,000 households in Michigan. The findings suggest that the upfront investment&lt;br /&gt;
costs are about twice the actual energy savings. Furthermore, the model-projected&lt;br /&gt;
savings are more than three times the actual savings. Although this might be&lt;br /&gt;
attributed to the “rebound” effect—when demand for energy end uses increases&lt;br /&gt;
as a result of greater efficiency—the article fails to find evidence of significantly&lt;br /&gt;
higher indoor temperatures at weatherized homes. Even when accounting for the&lt;br /&gt;
broader societal benefits derived from emissions reductions, the costs still substantially outweigh the benefits; the average rate of return is approximately −7.8%&lt;br /&gt;
annually.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rasmusen p1vaim</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>