<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Proofs--_Bad_Ones</id>
	<title>Proofs-- Bad Ones - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Proofs--_Bad_Ones"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?title=Proofs--_Bad_Ones&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-13T18:29:38Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.32.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?title=Proofs--_Bad_Ones&amp;diff=1542&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Rasmusen p1vaim: Created page with &quot;What bad proofs might go in a course on bad proofs?   I'm thinking such a course could be a fun way to teach students, at grad or undergrad level, how to do proofs. It would i...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?title=Proofs--_Bad_Ones&amp;diff=1542&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2021-03-27T15:18:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;What bad proofs might go in a course on bad proofs?   I&amp;#039;m thinking such a course could be a fun way to teach students, at grad or undergrad level, how to do proofs. It would i...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;What bad proofs might go in a course on bad proofs? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm thinking such a course could be a fun way to teach students, at grad or undergrad level, how to do proofs. It would include some math classics of the 1=2 and diagonal length of a square equals side length variety with some published economics or math proofs with fatal errors. Answers can be at any level, but the proofs should have one of these features: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Have flaws that are easy to see ex post. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) Be short. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) Be in a classic paper. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) Illustrate a subtle and dangerous flaw. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is, no sign errors in the middle of 5 pages of algebra in some East Slovakian working paper. &lt;br /&gt;
----------&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rasmusen p1vaim</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>