Difference between revisions of "SpeechFirst University Database cases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→The 4th Circuit Virginia Tech Case) |
(→The 4th Circuit Virginia Tech Case) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/13_Opening-Br..pdf The SpeechFirst Main Brief] and [https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/33_Reply-Brief.pdf Reply Brief] | *[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/13_Opening-Br..pdf The SpeechFirst Main Brief] and [https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/33_Reply-Brief.pdf Reply Brief] | ||
− | *[ Virginia Tech's response brief] | + | *[https://rasmusen.org/special/Virginia_tech_response-brief Virginia Tech's response brief] |
+ | |||
+ | *[https://rasmusen.org/special/21-2061Docket.mhtml The appellate docket] | ||
====Amici, Pro-SpeechFirst==== | ====Amici, Pro-SpeechFirst==== | ||
Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
*[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/21_LJC-Brief.pdf Cato and ACTA], counsel Ilya Solmin. | *[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/21_LJC-Brief.pdf Cato and ACTA], counsel Ilya Solmin. | ||
− | + | There were no amici for Virginia Tech. | |
==Other Circuits== | ==Other Circuits== |
Revision as of 19:28, 24 July 2023
Contents
Introduction
The 4th Circuit Virginia Tech Case
The District Court
- The District Court opinion by Judge Urbanski
- The Complaint by SpeechFirst.
The Appellate Court
- The 4th Circuit Court Opinion, with dissent by Judge Wilkinson.
Amici, Pro-SpeechFirst
- Cato and ACTA, counsel Ilya Solmin.
There were no amici for Virginia Tech.
Other Circuits
- Speech First v. Fenves, 979 F.3d 319 (5th Cir. 2020), as revised. University of Texas. Texas loses.
- Speech First v. Schlissel, 939 F.3d 756 (6th Cir. 2019). University of Michigan. Michigan loses.
- Speech First v. Killeen, 968 F.3d 628, (7th Circuit). University of Illinois. Illinois wins.
- Speech First v. Cartwright, 32 F.4th 1110 (11th Cir. 2022). University of Central Florida. Central Florida loses.