Difference between revisions of "SpeechFirst University Database cases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Other Circuits) |
(→The District Court) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/VTComplaintApril7.pdf The Complaint] by SpeechFirst. | *[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/VTComplaintApril7.pdf The Complaint] by SpeechFirst. | ||
| − | *[https://rasmusen.org/special/ | + | *[https://rasmusen.org/special/Hearing91pages_W.D.Virginia.pdf The 91-page hearing transcript] |
*[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/VA-Tech-District-Opinion.pdf The District Court opinion] by Judge Urbanski | *[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/VA-Tech-District-Opinion.pdf The District Court opinion] by Judge Urbanski | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 26 July 2023
Contents
Introduction
The 4th Circuit Virginia Tech Case
The District Court
- The Complaint by SpeechFirst.
- The District Court opinion by Judge Urbanski
The Appellate Court
- The 4th Circuit Court Opinion, with dissent by Judge Wilkinson.
Amici, Pro-SpeechFirst
- Cato and ACTA, counsel Ilya Solmin.
There were no amici for Virginia Tech.
Other Circuits
- Speech First v. Fenves, 979 F.3d 319 (5th Cir. 2020), as revised. University of Texas. Texas loses.
- Speech First v. Schlissel, 939 F.3d 756 (6th Cir. 2019). University of Michigan. Michigan loses.
- Speech First v. Killeen, 968 F.3d 628, (7th Circuit). University of Illinois. Illinois wins.
- Speech First v. Cartwright, 32 F.4th 1110 (11th Cir. 2022). University of Central Florida. Central Florida loses.
