Difference between revisions of "Texas v. Tech Lords"

From Rasmapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Paxton v. Netchoice (Texas vs. BigTech)== *NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton, Judge Robert Pitman, Western District of Texas (Austin), CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:21-cv-0084...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Introduction==
 +
*I should reorganize to have pages on [[Section 230: The Platform Law]] and [[NetChoice v. Moody: Florida]] and [[Biden v. Knight: Thomas Dissent]].
 +
 
==  Paxton v. Netchoice (Texas vs. BigTech)==
 
==  Paxton v. Netchoice (Texas vs. BigTech)==
 
*NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton,    Judge Robert Pitman, Western District of Texas (Austin), CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:21-cv-00840.  In the 5th Circuit it is case 21-51178.
 
*NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton,    Judge Robert Pitman, Western District of Texas (Austin), CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:21-cv-00840.  In the 5th Circuit it is case 21-51178.

Revision as of 11:19, 29 July 2023

Introduction

Paxton v. Netchoice (Texas vs. BigTech)

  • NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton, Judge Robert Pitman, Western District of Texas (Austin), CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:21-cv-00840. In the 5th Circuit it is case 21-51178.



The Texas Statute

The statute is here:

Sec. 143A.002.  CENSORSHIP PROHIBITED. (a)  A social media platform or interactive computer service may not censor a user, a user's expression, or a user's ability to receive the expression of another person based on:
 	             (1)  the viewpoint of the user or another person;
 	             (2)  the viewpoint represented in the user's expression
 	or another person's expression; or
 	             (3)  a user's geographic location in this state or any part of this state.
 	       (b)  This section applies regardless of whether the
 	viewpoint is expressed on a social media platform or interactive
 	computer service or through any other medium.