Difference between revisions of "Con Law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "*Any theory of con law (originalism, Dworkin, etc.) should be compelled to show how it applies to interpreting (a) a commercial contract, and (b) a tax statute. That would s...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Any theory of con law (originalism, Dworkin, etc.) should be compelled to show how it applies to interpreting (a) a commercial contract, and (b) a tax statute. That would show off the theory's points without the complication of political rationalization. | *Any theory of con law (originalism, Dworkin, etc.) should be compelled to show how it applies to interpreting (a) a commercial contract, and (b) a tax statute. That would show off the theory's points without the complication of political rationalization. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *"For those reading essays onthe best interpretation of the Birthright Citizenship Clause: Be attentive to whether they are based on "plain meaning of text," "original understanding of ratifiers," "framers/ratifiers expected application," "implications of judicial precedent, "history and tradition," or "living constitutionalism." These are all different, rely on different evidence, and are driven by different normative theories." Curt Lash, X (2025). | ||
Latest revision as of 13:56, 25 January 2025
- Any theory of con law (originalism, Dworkin, etc.) should be compelled to show how it applies to interpreting (a) a commercial contract, and (b) a tax statute. That would show off the theory's points without the complication of political rationalization.
- "For those reading essays onthe best interpretation of the Birthright Citizenship Clause: Be attentive to whether they are based on "plain meaning of text," "original understanding of ratifiers," "framers/ratifiers expected application," "implications of judicial precedent, "history and tradition," or "living constitutionalism." These are all different, rely on different evidence, and are driven by different normative theories." Curt Lash, X (2025).
