...here and they
certainly make clear why Bush is the worst President in
the history of the United States.  How embarrassing that so many law
professors who blog won't say as much. 
 My own
list of candidates for Worst President Ever would probably be drawn from the set of
Andrew Johnson, Lyndon
Johnson,  Buchanan,  Jackson, and  Wilson. Probably Tyler, Fillmore, and
Pierce would enter the list too, if I could remember  more about them. Maybe Grant,
Nixon,
Truman, and  Roosevelt, too-- but that gets us into the bimodal presidents--those
who had both big pluses and big minuses.    But surely  even a liberal
could find 
someone worse than Bush in  these lists.  Allowing the Civil War to start, trying to
block Reconstruction,  getting mired in Vietnam and the Great Society, and   deporting
the Five Civilized Tribes all are   at least a notch more important than a small tax cut
and  a couple of low-casualty wars. Liberals have no sense of history. Or even  if you
think Bush's Patriot Act is bad policy, do you really prefer Wilson's Palmer Raids,
Adams's Alien and Sedition Acts, and Roosevelt's Japanese internment? Do you Bush haters
of the   older generation really think Richard Nixon, the former object of your hatred,
looks good by comparison? And don't you remember what you used to say about the dangers
of having Ronald Reagan in the White House?     
  [ 
http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/04.01.10a.htm .     erasmusen@yahoo.com. ] 
   
 
    
To return to   Eric Rasmusen's weblog, click  
http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/0.rasmusen.htm.      
   
 
Anti-Bush Ads are...