...here and they
certainly make clear why Bush is the worst President in
the history of the United States. How embarrassing that so many law
professors who blog won't say as much.
My own
list of candidates for Worst President Ever would probably be drawn from the set of
Andrew Johnson, Lyndon
Johnson, Buchanan, Jackson, and Wilson. Probably Tyler, Fillmore, and
Pierce would enter the list too, if I could remember more about them. Maybe Grant,
Nixon,
Truman, and Roosevelt, too-- but that gets us into the bimodal presidents--those
who had both big pluses and big minuses. But surely even a liberal
could find
someone worse than Bush in these lists. Allowing the Civil War to start, trying to
block Reconstruction, getting mired in Vietnam and the Great Society, and deporting
the Five Civilized Tribes all are at least a notch more important than a small tax cut
and a couple of low-casualty wars. Liberals have no sense of history. Or even if you
think Bush's Patriot Act is bad policy, do you really prefer Wilson's Palmer Raids,
Adams's Alien and Sedition Acts, and Roosevelt's Japanese internment? Do you Bush haters
of the older generation really think Richard Nixon, the former object of your hatred,
looks good by comparison? And don't you remember what you used to say about the dangers
of having Ronald Reagan in the White House?
[
http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/04.01.10a.htm . erasmusen@yahoo.com. ]
To return to Eric Rasmusen's weblog, click
http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/0.rasmusen.htm.
Anti-Bush Ads are...