...
An interesting academic paper about the evolution of public radio, "Guys in Suits with
Charts," by a historian named Alan G. Stavitsky, describes "the transformation of public
radio from its educational, service-based origins to an audience-driven orientation."
...
" Public service became a euphemism for ratings ," Goldfarb says.
In one recent presentation to program directors, for example, Giovannoni congratulated
those who had contributed to the growth in public radio's nationwide ratings. "Five
years ago, you generated 57 percent of all public service; today you generate 68
percent." Indeed, in many of Giovannoni's public radio reports, the words ratings,
listenership, and public service are used interchangeably.
...
A public radio veteran who laments the demise of arts and music programming recalls a
public radio convention in the early '90s, just as the new generation of programmers
were beginning to redirect their stations away from classical music. One of the public
radio researchers hooked up a group of 40 or so program directors and station managers
to a "dial machine." The idea was to play a series of musical snippets, from classical
through jazz and pop to hard rock, and the machine would record their reactions in real
time on a graph, from high (favorable) to low (unfavorable).
"The graph recorded a perfect slanting line . . . from left to right," the veteran told
me. Classical was at the low end, the least favored. Then the consultant brought out a
graph showing the reactions of a group of longtime public radio listeners to the same
series of musical snippets.
"The graph of the listeners showed a perfect slanting line again, but from right to
left--exactly the opposite. If you overlaid the two lines, you got an x figure. The
tastes of the PDs and the listeners were opposite."
...
Joan Kroc, widow of Ray Kroc, the founder of McDonald's, recently left a legacy of $235
million for NPR to spend as it pleases. Of the many ideas floated by network officials
in the newspapers and trade publications about how to spend Mrs. Kroc's money, none has
involved expanding music or arts programming; the first decision taken--after every
employee was given a bonus--was to hire 45 more reporters for the newsmagazines.
...
"They were from a mix of stations, big and little, different formats, mostly classical,
some jazz," Horwitz says. "The idea was to help the stations learn to make money--
increase revenue, excuse me. So all day Saturday the consultants get up and present this
huge amount of research and data, showing, or at least claiming to show, that when you
got rid of music and arts and programmed news and talk instead, you spiked your numbers.
Ratings go up. Donations go up. Underwriting goes up.
"Then it's late afternoon, and the consultants say, 'Okay, you've seen the data. Now
you've got the night off. We want you all to go away for some downtime. And when you
come back tomorrow, tell us how you're going to fix your station.'
"Sunday morning--it was just sad, pathetic. It was like an AA meeting. It was like total
defeat. You had these PDs getting up, hanging their heads, and they're saying, 'Hi, my
name's Bill, and I . . . I . . . I've been programming opera!"
...
"The irony is, the economics for a classical music station are very good. It's very
cheap to do classical music programming, and it's very cheap to do well. You've got an
installed base of listeners in most communities, and they object very strenuously when
you drop a full-service classical station.
"But there are two problems for these guys. There are only 24 hours in a day. And as 24-
hour news has become ascendant and dominant, the music is going to feel the squeeze from
news and talk. That's just the way it is.
"The other problem is, a lot of these people are living in the past. They see themselves
as educators. They go back to that early tradition of educational radio, when the object
was to teach people something about the music. They say they're the bearers of the
flame--the canon and all that.
"But I'm sorry. That's not the way public radio understands public service today."
According to data from the trade group M Street Group, the number of noncommercial
stations identified as "classical" has been cut in half since 1993, while the number of
noncommercial news-talk stations has tripled.
The natural question is why we continue to use government money to support public radio.
It is an especially interesting question because the federal government is now run by
Republicans, and public radio is a huge source of free Democrat advertising.
[This page is
http://www.rasmusen.org/w/04.06.17a.htm]
To return to Eric Rasmusen's weblog, click http://www.rasmusen.org/w/0.htm.