DANIEL PIPES'S BOOK, Militant Islam Reaches America, will probably make
it to my Christmas Recommendation List this
year. Although it is a thinly disguised compilation of his journalism, there is a
common theme: Islamism is a new political ideology that is dangerous in all its forms
but downplayed by governments and press. Some facts and ideas, some mine, some Pipes's:
- "Where a traditional Muslim would say something like, 'We are neither Jews nor
Chirstians, but Muslims,' a member of the Muslim Brethren from Egypt says that 'We are
neither socialist nor capitalist, but Muslims.'" (p. 8) Islamism is not about religion,
but about countering Western success now that socialism has so clearly failed. It is
not the reactionaries that have turned into Islamists, but the Marxists.
- It is not so strange that the 9-11 hijackers were so dissolute in their personal
lives. Islam is a legalistic religion. If you are going to die in jihad, you are going
to heaven, for sure. So you have plenty of "virtue credit" to use up in sinning. (me,
not Pipes)
- The Islamists don't know or care about traditional Islam. They are engineering
types, who have read the Koran, but no commentaries. In this, they are like the Puritans
of 1600, who use their own interpretations, look down on traditionalists, and seek to
combine modern learning with the original purity of the religion, skipping everything in
between.
- One quarter of the population of Brussels is Moslem (p. 25). That, not deference to
France, explains why Belgium was in the Axis of Weasels (me).
- The central theme of politics in Middle Eastern countries is no longer how a
politicians stands on Israel. Rather, it is how he stands on Islamism (p. 39).
- In the Cold War, it made sense for the US to support rightwing tyrannies, because
Communism spreads, and it was the greater danger. Now, it makes sense for the US to
support leftwing tyrannies (or any kind of secular ones, actually), because Communism
is not a threat but Islamism is (p. 49).
- Friday is not a day of rest for Moslems--- it is a day of religious gathering,
with work done the rest of the day. The Ottoman Empire introduced the first day of rest
in 1829, making it the religiously neutral Thursday. Turkey made Sunday the day in
1935, at the instigation of local businessmen. Virtually all of the other Moslem
countries inherited Sunday as a day of rest from the colonial governments, and kept it
after independence, though now there has been change to Friday (p. 77).
- The Islamic law, Sharia, that is favored by the Islamists, differs in three
fundamental ways from real Sharia (p. 81):
- Law is created and interpreted by the state, like the Napoleonic code, not by
independent scholars. In this, traditional Islam went even further than the English
common law, because the king did not appoint the Islamic scholars.
- Law is subordinate to the interests of the state, rather than religion taking
precedence. If the state says to skip fasting so you are stronger for a war, you have to
skip fasting.
- Islamic law applies to everyone in a territory, rather than to Moslems everywhere
and non-Moslems nowhere.
I conjecture that these second two features are another reason for the immorality of
the 9-11 terrorists. They were free to "blend in" by violating religious rules in order
to further their mission, and anyway they were in a country where Islamic law did not
rule.
- The veil nowadays is so important because the Islamists, unlike traditionalists,
are feminists, who want women to go to school and work. They can't work with men unless
they are protected from lust. Thus, the veil (p. 79).
The book has made me realize what a useful analytic tool the list is. Most authors in
the humanities don't get even that analytic, and it sure does help to have lists of
features of reality and recommended policies. Pipes is a sharp thinker, one reason his
book is so interesting.
[
http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/03.06.09a.htm ]
To return to Eric Rasmusen's weblog, click
http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/0.rasmusen.htm.