HOW DID THE EARLY CHURCH MANAGE to come out with a reasonably strong consensus on
orthodox belief? The Gnostics and Judaizers lost out, after all, and notwithstanding the
Arian controversy and suchlike subtle issues, the Christianity of the Apostle's Creed
seems to have been universal by 300. In
Professor Gary Anderson's review of Elaine Pagels' silly new book on gnosticism
(in the Weekly Standard), he raises this good question, as well as politely knocking
her out of the ring:
THE QUESTION PAGELS ought to pose, but never does, is why this far- flung, highly
decentralized network found the teaching of figures like Irenaeus and Origen so
compelling in the absence of a larger power structure to enforce it. The governance of
the Christian movement in the second, third, and even fourth centuries cannot be
characterized in simplistic top-down terms; much of what now has come to be
characterized as "orthodox" emerged from the ground up.
In sum, what we have in Elaine Pagels's "Beyond Belief" is a well- written account of
why one educated woman finds herself unable to recite the creeds today--and why the
Gnostics, rather than the orthodox early Christians, seem to her closer to the typical
feelings of a twenty- first-century college professor.
My own advice to the perspective reader would be to read a precis of the Gnostic myth
and recite its cosmology six times before breakfast. If this sits well with you, then
proceed deeper. Most, however, will find the challenge beyond belief.
Although this anticlerical position will appeal to many modern readers, it is altogether
anachronistic to cede such power and authority to the Church in antiquity. Though
bishops frequently claimed great power, in reality they possessed little. As Harry
Gamble notes, the earliest Church was composed of "numerous and far-flung Christian
congregations, large and small, [that] nevertheless retained a sharp awareness of their
collective identity as the ecclesia katholike and affirmed their mutual relations
through frequent communication." The result was not a highly centralized power structure
run by a tiny elite of bishops but rather "a highly reticulated system of local
communities that spanned the Mediterranean world but preserved a strong sense of
translocal unity and cultivated contacts with each other."
[ http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/03.08.01a.htm ]
To return to Eric Rasmusen's weblog, click http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/0.rasmusen.htm.