I have mentioned the 2002 Historical Atlas of Jerusalem by Meir Ben- Dov before. Here's a chronology of control (rounded to the nearest century or so):
1000-600 BC: Israel and Judah---Jewish states with Jerusalem as their capital.
600-
150 BC: Babylonia, Persia, and Alexander the Great and his successors. Just a province
of a state with a capital elsewhere.
150-0 BC: Independent again, under the
Maccabees and Herod, and again the capital of a Jewish state. 0-300 AD: Roman pagan
rule. A province.
300-600 AD: Roman/Byzantine Christian rule. A province.
600-750 AD: Ummayads. Moslem rule from Damascus. A province.
750-900 AD: Abbasids.
Moslem rule from Baghdad. A province.
900-1000 AD: Various Moslem warlords, with
capitals at Cairo and Ramla.
1000-1050 AD: Fatimids. Shiites with their capital in
Egypt. A province.
1050-1100 AD: Seljuk Turks, with most of their kingdom in Syria
and Iraq. A province.
1100-1250: Crusaders, a Christian state with Jerusalem as
its capital, mixed with periods of rule by the Kurdish Ayyubids, whose capital was in
Egypt.
1200-1500: Mameluke Turks, with their capital in Egypt. A province.
1500-1900: Ottoman Turks, with their capital at Istanbul. A province.
1900-1950:
Britain. Christian rule from London. A province.
1950-2000: Israel. Jerusalem
again is the capital.
That's a broad-brush picture, but it is revealing. Note several points:
The historical claim is perhaps not the main moral argument for a Palestinian state. Nowadays, a more popular one is that a country should be ruled by the people who live there. That kind of "squatter" claim, however, is weak, since it can be eliminated by movin the people somewhere else. And of course most people do not apply that argument to most countries, since it involve granting self-rule to lots of minority regions presently ruled by neighboring larger peoples (e.g., the Kurds in Iraq, ruled by the Arabs who are the majority in the country).
[ permalink, http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/03.09.22a.htm ]