October 22, 2003. צ: ק: ר: ש: Race and Religion in the 1950's.

ש: Race and Religion in the 1950's. Via Clayton Cramer, I learn that there is a a new book out on the 1950's civil rights movement and religion: A Stone of Hope: Prophetic Religion and the Death of Jim Crow, by David L. Chappell. It is reviewed in The Atlantic Monthly,

...Chappell, a liberal atheist, goes further, contending, again convincingly, that the ethos of the southern black movement-- its pessimistic view of human nature, together with its ultimately redemptive faith-- was not merely different from but in essential ways antithetical to northerners' tepid liberalism. He points out, for instance, that Martin Luther King's often fundamentalist religious views and his excoriation of such elements of secular culture as rock-and-roll were positions foreign to his liberal sometime allies, and that the secular liberal creed of pluralism and political equality had proved inadequate and largely irrelevant to the contest in which southern blacks were engaged.

In the mid-1950s the Southern Baptists and the Southern Presbyterians each overwhelmingly passed resolutions endorsing desegregation, and appealing to all southerners to accept it peacefully (in the Southern Baptist Convention the vote was staggeringly lopsided--about 9,000 to 50). In a land that embraced literalist views of the Bible, nearly every important southern white conservative clergyman and theologian averred that there was no biblical sanction for segregation or for white supremacy. And the country's--and world's--best-known Southern Baptist, the North Carolinian Billy Graham, shared the pulpit with Martin Luther King in 1957, commended what he called the "social revolution" King was leading in the South, and, having no truck with what he saw as the modern, secular concept of racism, insisted, even in the Deep South and in contravention of local laws there, that his revival meetings (along with his ushering staffs and choir) be integrated.

I think maybe the reviewer is wrong and Graham not a Baptist, but this is nonetheless interesting. I wonder how the Southern Episcopalians and Methodists-- more liberal denominations, but more bound to convention and less to the Bible-- felt on the subject?

[ permalink, http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/03.10.22a.htm ]

To return to Eric Rasmusen's weblog, click http://php.indiana.edu/~erasmuse/w/0.rasmusen.htm.